diamond

Why TestArchitect?

A powerful test automation tool designed for large-scale testing projects.

It eliminates the need for coding skills, allowing any team member to contribute to the creation and execution of automation tests in plain English, accelerating automation adoption.

TestArchitect - A powerful test automation tool designed for large-scale testing projects.

Offers a unique keyword-driven approach that enhances test development efficiency and maintainability.

Its modular architecture supports high reusability, enabling teams to create scalable, reusable, and easily maintainable automated tests.

TestArchitect - Offers a unique keyword-driven approach that enhances test development efficiency and maintainability.

Ensure seamless automation across diverse environments.

Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities provide actionable insights that improve test coverage and software quality, with built-in integrations for DevOps, CI/CD pipelines, and customizable support for third-party platforms.

TestArchitect - Ensure seamless automation across diverse environments.
background

Fast and High Quality for Your Releases

Achieving quality at speed is essential for better business results. In contrast to manual testing or isolated automation, TestArchitect’s codeless automation approach dramatically shortens testing time, executing automated tests in minutes or hours rather than days or weeks.

10XFaster

ellipse-check

Fast-track your Testing

Accelerate automation development and test execution, reducing testing time by leveraging built-in rich libraries in plain English. Efficient framework empowers all team members can rapidly validate software quality and speed up release cycles.

50%Lower Cost

ellipse-check

Reduce Cost

Cut automation costs in half by minimizing automation test creation and maintenance, reducing reliance on specialized coding skills, and maximizing test reuse. Significant savings in both time and resources.

95%Test Coverage

ellipse-check

Boost Release Confidence

Achieve high test coverage by automating a vast majority of test cases, ensuring comprehensive validation across multiple environments, platforms, and user scenarios.

Coding-Based Solutions (Selenium, Playwright,...)
header2-image
ellipse-check

Heavy Coding Needed

Teams need technical expertise to build and maintain frameworks and automated tests

ellipse-check

No coding required

Enables teams to build, maintain, and scale test automation using rich prebuilt libraries in plain English, allowing them to start automating tests on day one.

ellipse-check

Lacks real user simulation

Code-based testing tools fail to accurately mirror real user interactions.Text Icon

ellipse-check

Replicates real user interaction

Provides a testing approach that closely mirrors actual user behavior and experiences by simulating mouse and keyboard interactions as real users would.

ellipse-check

Struggles with rapid development

Automation testing cannot keep up with in-sprint automation and fast release cycles.

ellipse-check

Keeps up with rapid development cycles

Supports in-sprint automation, allowing the QA team to automate tests within the same sprint as the development team and keep pace with rapid release cycles.

ellipse-check

Limited support for complex environments

Difficult to handle cross-platform automation and nonstandard requirements.

ellipse-check

Handles complex environments

Seamlessly supports cross-platform automation across desktop, web, and mobile, as well as nonstandard requirements and dynamic application setups. Tests automated on one platform can run on other platforms.

ellipse-check

Excludes domain experts

Non-technical QA professionals with strong product knowledge cannot contribute effectively.

ellipse-check

Empowers domain experts

Enables domain experts and non-technical QA professionals with deep product knowledge to automate tests in minutes without coding skills.

ellipse-check

Difficult for manual QA teams

Challenges in interpreting and resolving automated test failures

ellipse-check

Improves manual QA collaboration

Simplifies test failure interpretation, making it easier for manual QA teams to diagnose and address issues.

ellipse-check

High maintenance workload

QA engineers spend more time maintaining tests than automating new ones.

ellipse-check

Minimizes maintenance effort

Reduces the time spent on maintaining tests, allowing QA engineers to focus on new automation.

ellipse-check

Causes developer inefficiency

Frequent test failures lead to wasted time troubleshooting issues.

ellipse-check

Enhances developer efficiency

Reduces test failures and troubleshooting efforts, freeing developers to focus on feature development.

ellipse-check

Slow test automation

Automating a single test can take several weeks.

ellipse-check

Accelerates test automation

Enables the automation of new tests in hours or days instead of weeks.

Case Studies

case-study-image

LogiGear Assists DCIM Software Solution Provider with Test Automation Implementation Using TestArchitect™

case-study-image

Kratos Partners with LogiGear to Implement Continuous Testing to Reduce Testing Cycle from 6 Weeks to 24 Hours

case-study-image

Halliburton Reduces End-to-End Integration Testing Time by 99%

What our customers say

Quote

Schedule a Demo
and Experience TestArchitect in Action!

Discover how the leading continuous testing platform streamlines automation with a low-code/no-code approach.